Home / Health marketing compliance
For clinics · dental · physio · med spas
In Canada, how you advertise a clinic is regulated — by people who take complaints seriously.
A confident headline, a patient testimonial, a “before & after” — the things that sell most services can quietly cross a line in healthcare. Here’s who is watching, what gets practices in trouble, and how a marketing review protects you before anything goes live.
01Who regulates your marketing
Unlike a restaurant or a salon, a health practice answers to more than the market. Several bodies can act on how you advertise — and in Canada, the most active one is usually the one practitioners forget.
Your professional college
RCDSO (dentists), CPSO (physicians), the College of Physiotherapists, and their counterparts set advertising standards for members and investigate complaints. This is the regulator most likely to act — and discipline can become part of a public record.
Health Canada
Governs claims about drugs, medical devices and natural health products. What you may say about a product or therapy is constrained by its approved use.
Competition Bureau
Enforces the Competition Act against false or misleading marketing. Unsupported performance or comparative claims are reviewable conduct and can carry penalties.
CASL & PHIPA
CASL governs your email and electronic marketing. PHIPA (and PIPEDA) governs patient information — including anything a marketing funnel collects.
If your advertising targets U.S. patients, the FDA and FTC enter the picture too. They do not apply automatically to a Toronto practice serving Toronto patients — a distinction the generic “FDA compliance” pitch usually gets wrong.
02The claims that get practices in trouble
- “Cure / treat / heal / guaranteed.” Outcome promises for a condition are among the fastest ways to draw a complaint.
- Before & after images without proper consent, context, or a note that results vary.
- Testimonials presented as if they were typical, representative results.
- “Best / #1 / leading” and comparative claims you can’t substantiate.
- Off-label or unapproved drug and device claims beyond approved use.
- Missing disclaimers where the college or product approval requires them.
03What a review actually produces
We read every public claim on your site, profile and ads, and return a Health Marketing Compliance Review. For each flagged item:
the exact source text → the possible issue → jurisdiction → which regulator →
risk level → the official reference → a recommended replacement →
whether a physician or lawyer should sign off
Each review closes with a plain status, so you know where you stand:
No material issuesNothing flagged at review level.
Corrections recommendedSpecific edits, with replacement wording.
Professional review requiredItems that need a physician or lawyer before publishing.
This is not legal advice. R·N·D Presence provides a marketing-compliance review to help you reduce risk before content goes live. It is not a law firm, does not provide legal advice, and does not issue regulatory certification or approval. Final responsibility for published claims rests with the practice; for binding questions, consult your professional college or qualified counsel.